Advertiser Disclosure: The Bulkhead Seat earns an affiliate commission for anyone approved through the links below. This compensation may impact how and where links appear on this site. We work to provide the best publicly available offers to our readers. We frequently update them, but this site does not include all available offers.
An American Airlines passenger traveling from the United States to Tokyo when they discovered a used and bloody pair of women’s panties stuffed into their First Class seat. Flagship® Business service comes with plenty of perks and amenities, but this is one this traveler could have done without.
@garyleff in all my travels, nothing prepared for me what I found next to my seat on my @AmericanAir business class seat to Tokyo yesterday. I looked down and saw a dirty/bloody woman's underwear 🤮🤮. I mean come on pic.twitter.com/RxACZliuwt
— Officially (@get0ffdanutzz) September 1, 2023
The Twitter/X post from user @get0ffdanutzz said that the discovery was made yesterday. American flies to Tokyo from both Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) and Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). It’s not specified where this flight originated, but is disgusting regardless of departure city.
Looking at American’s site, it advertises that Flagship® Business includes “elevated amenities and services on international flights between the U.S. and Asia, Australia, Europe, New Zealand and South America.”
Anthony’s Take: This is so revolting. Why would a passenger leave their dirty underwear behind? This is almost as much on them as it is on the cleaning crew and airline for not providing a sanitary space to fly. I’ve found crumbs, garbage, and even a used diaper in a seatback pocket, but this takes it to another level. Yuck.
(H/T: View from the Wing.)
User Generated Content Disclosure: The Bulkhead Seat encourages constructive discussions, comments, and questions. Responses are not provided by or commissioned by any bank advertisers. These responses have not been reviewed, approved, or endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the responsibility of the bank advertiser to respond to comments.