Advertiser & Editorial Disclosure: The Bulkhead Seat earns an affiliate commission for anyone approved through the links below. This compensation may impact how and where links appear on this site. We work to provide the best publicly available offers to our readers. We frequently update them, but this site does not include all available offers. Opinions, reviews, analyses & recommendations are the author’s alone, and have not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved by any of these entities.
Travelers don’t normally wonder if it’s safe to drink the water in California, but that question might be worth asking if staying at the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay. On November 18, 2022, a woman drank from a bottle of water that the luxury hotel provided. She knew it tasted off and laboratory testing confirmed it was laced with semen. Now, a lawsuit has been filed against the hotel.
Insider reports that a couple, identified as John and Jane Doe, stayed at the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay last November. They requested bottles of water be delivered to their room. The front desk had them sent right away. The woman put the bottle on her nightstand and went to sleep. She woke up during the night and drank from the bottle. According to the lawsuit, “she opened it, took a drink, and knew immediately that something was wrong with the liquid she had just swallowed.”
The suit goes on to read, “Jane Doe was mortified, terrified, embarrassed, and humiliated, but shared her suspicion with her husband, who then asked the hotel security and management representatives to call the police.” The San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office responded to the call and filed a report. The water bottle was taken by the hotel and sent to a laboratory for testing.
A claims adjuster for Marriott called the couple after the incident to confirm that there was semen in the bottle. The suit claims that the hotel refuses to give the water bottle or the test results to law enforcement for analysis. It “will not disclose the identities of the hotel employees on duty that day so that their backgrounds and criminal histories can be scrutinized.”
As a result of the incident, the couple is suing the hotel for sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and loss of consortium. They are seeking a jury trial. Because the victim did not consent to contact with the employee’s semen, the employee’s action constituted sexual battery.
The New York Post shares that the lawsuit states that the employee “intended to inflict severe emotional distress upon each of them.” Their actions caused the couple to feel “anguish, nervousness, anxiety, grief, worry, shock, humiliation, and embarrassment.” She and her husband have three children and have been married for 25 years. In that time, they have stayed in Marriott-branded hotels at least 600 times (including at its Ritz-Carlton properties).
The Ritz-Carlton is named because, according to the suit, it’s “liable for [the] negligent and reckless behavior” of the employee. Finally, John Doe has been deprived of his wife’s affection and sexual relations as a result of the incident. The couple seeks damages over $75,000.
If you thought this was the first time an incident like this has occurred at a hotel, you’d be wrong. CBS News reported that a Fullerton, CA man ejaculated into his female coworker’s water bottle in 2011. Michael Lallana, 32, was found guilty of assault and battery. Jurors also found that he did it for sexual gratification in that it excited him that “her lips had touched” the bottle.
Anthony’s Take: Yuck. I don’t know what would possess anyone to ejaculate into a water bottle. It will be interesting to see if this goes to trial or is settled out of court by Marriott or the property.
(Featured Image Credit: Sacramento Bee.)
User Generated Content Disclosure: The Bulkhead Seat encourages constructive discussions, comments, and questions. Responses are not provided by or commissioned by any bank advertisers. These responses have not been reviewed, approved, or endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the responsibility of the bank advertiser to respond to comments.
Advertiser & Editorial Disclosure: The Bulkhead Seat earns an affiliate commission for anyone approved through the links above This compensation may impact how and where links appear on this site. We work to provide the best publicly available offers to our readers. We frequently update them, but this site does not include all available offers. Opinions, reviews, analyses & recommendations are the author’s alone, and have not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved by any of these entities.
1 comment
Absolutely horrific. This is also why I don’t really like wall mounted refillable shampoo and body wash dispensers in hotels. The Hotel Imposible guy always made it a point to show how easily those can be opened.
I’m always curious in these suits where they throw in the loss of intimacy as a result and seek damages for that. I once had to testify in a ridiculous case for the airline I worked for because we got sued by a couple who alleges that they couldn’t consummate their marriage on their honeymoon because we embarrassed them by making them pay for their bag.
The criminal investigation part of this Ritz case is interesting. I was told this by a friend who is a FBI Special Agent long ago… if you ever suspect tampering or interference or anything with something someone gave you, last thing you do is let them keep it in their possession.